Elon Musk has picked a new fight, and this time his target is Apple. The billionaire entrepreneur, who leads xAI and owns X (formerly Twitter), has accused Apple of tilting its App Store in favor of OpenAI and shutting out rival AI products.
In a series of posts on X, Musk claimed Apple’s ranking algorithms make it “impossible for any AI company besides OpenAI to reach #1 in the App Store.” He also criticized Apple’s curated “Must Have” lists, which excluded both X and xAI’s Grok chatbot. Grok ranks fifth among all apps, and X is the top news app globally. Musk called the practice an “unequivocal antitrust violation” and promised legal action.
Apple’s Curation Under Fire
Apple has not responded publicly, but its curated lists are not automated rankings. They are editorial selections, intended to highlight quality, innovation, and relevance. Supporters of Apple argue that these lists protect users from spam, scams, and low-quality apps.
Critics of Musk’s position note that other AI apps, such as DeepSeek and Perplexity, have reached the #1 spot in the App Store. This suggests that OpenAI is not the only AI company to benefit from visibility. Still, the influence Apple holds over which apps appear prominently cannot be ignored.
More Than Just Rankings
Musk’s frustration is not simply about placement on a list. The App Store is a gateway to over a billion iOS devices. For AI companies, visibility on this platform can be the difference between rapid adoption and obscurity. If Apple’s editorial control creates even the perception of favoritism, it risks undermining trust in its marketplace.
Apple, on the other hand, has long maintained that its oversight is essential. In its view, the App Store is not a neutral shelf where all products get equal exposure. It is a curated space, and curation is part of its value proposition.
The OpenAI Rivalry
The personal history between Musk and OpenAI adds heat to the dispute. Musk co-founded OpenAI in 2015 but left three years later. Since then, he has criticized its direction and profit motives. OpenAI CEO Sam Altman responded to Musk’s accusation by suggesting that Musk himself manipulates X to favor his own companies and disadvantage competitors.
This public back-and-forth ensures that the controversy is not just about business policy. It is also about personal rivalry, industry influence, and the future of AI adoption.
Regulatory Context
The timing of this dispute is significant. Apple is already facing antitrust scrutiny in the United States and Europe. The European Union’s Digital Markets Act has forced it to loosen control over its ecosystem, while U.S. lawmakers continue to investigate its App Store practices. Musk’s claims may not trigger new regulations, but they add a high-profile voice to ongoing debates about platform gatekeeping.
Whether Apple’s actions amount to an antitrust violation depends on proof. It would require showing that Apple intentionally favored OpenAI over competitors in a way that harmed market fairness. Without clear evidence, Musk’s case may rely more on public pressure than on legal strength.
Who Holds the Power?
This clash highlights a larger question: how much control should one company have over what people see and use on their devices? Apple’s App Store is a powerful distribution channel. Even small changes in rankings or recommendations can influence which technologies reach mass adoption.
Musk’s position frames this as a fight for fair access in the AI market. Apple’s defenders argue it is about preserving quality, safety, and user trust. Both views have merit, and both reveal the tension between open competition and controlled curation.
The Broader Stakes
This is not just a dispute between two tech giants. It is a preview of future conflicts over digital marketplaces. As AI, augmented reality, and other emerging technologies compete for attention, a handful of companies will act as gatekeepers. Their algorithms, policies, and editorial choices will shape the pace and direction of innovation.
The fight between Musk and Apple could be an early test of how these battles will play out. It forces regulators, developers, and consumers to ask whether current platform controls serve the public interest—or whether they give too much power to the companies that run them.
and then